Only Flame poll
- noiseradio
- Posts: 2295
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 12:04 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
- Contact:
Only Flame poll
Something occured to me this morning listening to the GCW bonus disc. (Absurdly hypothetical situation alert). If by some unforseen set of circumstances, the only song by Elvis Costello that still existed in recorded format in 100 years was The Only Flame in Town, which version would you want it to be. Keep in mind that future generations would be unaware of ANY OTHER contribution to songcraft that EC had ever done. While this would be a tragic loss, there's still this one tune that exists. SO would you rather future generations knew EC by the demo version or the sax and oates version? Which would be the better version to represent Costello's brilliance?
Last edited by noiseradio on Mon Aug 23, 2004 9:24 pm, edited 2 times in total.
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
--William Shakespeare
--William Shakespeare
-
- Posts: 1752
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 10:14 pm
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 1752
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 10:14 pm
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
- Contact:
Taken outside the context of the rest of EC's work, the GCW version of Flame sounds like a bad song by a bad singer with bad sax squealing. Although it's the ugliest version of this song put to vinyl (or plastic), it does fit in with the rest of the album content better than the demo and live acoustic versions.
I really like the demo band version; however, if you really want to HEAR and FEEL the song, the live acoustic version on the GCW bonus disc is the one that best represents EC abilities as a songwriter and singer (for me, at least.)
I really like the demo band version; however, if you really want to HEAR and FEEL the song, the live acoustic version on the GCW bonus disc is the one that best represents EC abilities as a songwriter and singer (for me, at least.)
- noiseradio
- Posts: 2295
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 12:04 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 8:33 am
The truth is that the phrasing of the poll question is slightly tricky. If TOFIT was the only EC song the world would ever hear, it would be a pretty unimpressive legacy for the beloved entertainer.
The choice would be between a fairly throwaway pop song and a turgid, overwrought ballad. Neither version stands alone as particularly substantial or as a good example of what EC does.
The ballad version is probably more typical of EC. It's melancholy, which is a tone closer to EC's heart, and is more indicative of his body of work.
The album version is a pop song, upbeat and lacking any real anger or bite. There is some punnery there, but it is a pretty atypical kind of song for him. So asking which version should be the ONLY remaining example of Costello's work will likely lead many to pick the ballad version, if only because it is more typically EC.
I'm not suggesting this is the only reason-- clearly, many people dislike the album version, and I used to be among them. But the poll would be slightly fairer if the question were simply, "which version do you like the best?"
I think the ballad versions have music that is wildly at odds with the lyrics, and not in a way that works. It's like having a version of "Party Party" arranged to fit on Sinatra's "Only the Lonely." To me, it just isn't a very deep song, and all that "less tender and more tinder" wordplay works better in a pop song than it does in an i'm-so-serious moaning ballad.
The choice would be between a fairly throwaway pop song and a turgid, overwrought ballad. Neither version stands alone as particularly substantial or as a good example of what EC does.
The ballad version is probably more typical of EC. It's melancholy, which is a tone closer to EC's heart, and is more indicative of his body of work.
The album version is a pop song, upbeat and lacking any real anger or bite. There is some punnery there, but it is a pretty atypical kind of song for him. So asking which version should be the ONLY remaining example of Costello's work will likely lead many to pick the ballad version, if only because it is more typically EC.
I'm not suggesting this is the only reason-- clearly, many people dislike the album version, and I used to be among them. But the poll would be slightly fairer if the question were simply, "which version do you like the best?"
I think the ballad versions have music that is wildly at odds with the lyrics, and not in a way that works. It's like having a version of "Party Party" arranged to fit on Sinatra's "Only the Lonely." To me, it just isn't a very deep song, and all that "less tender and more tinder" wordplay works better in a pop song than it does in an i'm-so-serious moaning ballad.
-
- Posts: 2476
- Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2003 8:35 am
I have to say that I'd keep the original. It's not that I think the alternate version is bad, quite the contrary. I just think that this is one of the few songs on GCW which the production doesn't detract from the music (it undoubtedly attracts from the sentiment...it's like sneezing an 'I love you'). I prefer the hurried 'vocal delivery' a lot, better than the alt. version. The 'cheesiness' (how can I put that more saliently?) of the record is fun in a way (like Noise pointed out) that it reflects the time it was made. Nothing wrong with that.
I'll be a monkey's uncle of EC sings the album version in a venue near you soon though.
I'll be a monkey's uncle of EC sings the album version in a venue near you soon though.
- noiseradio
- Posts: 2295
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 12:04 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
- Contact:
"Which version do you like best?" wasn't the point though. The point was which version would you prefer if there was only one. It's not an unfair question, just a different question than you wanted to answer. By all means, feel free to make a poll that asks the question you want, and I'll vote there as well.
You're quite right that none would be a good legacy for EC. It's not his best song, regardless of the version. But it's my hypothetical universe, so them's the rules.
My feeling is that the songs on the album reflect the mood he was in at the time. He wrote them in the throes of divorce, with the UK having invaded the Faulklands. Bleak worldview for the artist. The words do not convey a sense of hope and light; they're dark pretty much throughout. The original version of TOFIT undercuts this in every conceivable way. That can be clever--writing a depressing song with a catchy melody. They Might Be Giants have made a career out of it. But in this case, it just sounds like someone else recorded it. It's completely out of place. It fits neither the mood nor sound of the rest of the record. Its cheesiness is not quaint or charming the way so much retro 80's music is. It sounds so calculatedly radiobound, I wouldn't have been surprised to find it on a Phil Collins record (that's not a compliment). And while having a dated sound is not inherantly awful, this particular sound should have died never to be reborn. If this were the only way Elvis was to be remembered, people would write him off as a hack. With the demo version, even if it's not his finest hour, at least it's not embarrasing.
You're quite right that none would be a good legacy for EC. It's not his best song, regardless of the version. But it's my hypothetical universe, so them's the rules.
My feeling is that the songs on the album reflect the mood he was in at the time. He wrote them in the throes of divorce, with the UK having invaded the Faulklands. Bleak worldview for the artist. The words do not convey a sense of hope and light; they're dark pretty much throughout. The original version of TOFIT undercuts this in every conceivable way. That can be clever--writing a depressing song with a catchy melody. They Might Be Giants have made a career out of it. But in this case, it just sounds like someone else recorded it. It's completely out of place. It fits neither the mood nor sound of the rest of the record. Its cheesiness is not quaint or charming the way so much retro 80's music is. It sounds so calculatedly radiobound, I wouldn't have been surprised to find it on a Phil Collins record (that's not a compliment). And while having a dated sound is not inherantly awful, this particular sound should have died never to be reborn. If this were the only way Elvis was to be remembered, people would write him off as a hack. With the demo version, even if it's not his finest hour, at least it's not embarrasing.
Last edited by noiseradio on Mon Aug 23, 2004 4:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
--William Shakespeare
--William Shakespeare
-
- Posts: 2476
- Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2003 8:35 am
So what you're saying is that someone might be altrusitic in their choice, and go for a version that a greater percentage of the population could enjoy. I would say it's IMPOSSIBLE for anyone to prefer one version, but vote for another.
The selfish gene! (unless everyone genetically related to you prefers another version, and their reproductive success will be influenced greater than your is lessened, by you choosing another version.... ...I doubt anyone's reprodcutive success will be influenced by The only flame in town though - even the slow versions!)
Sad science geezer alert - I'll get me coat!
The selfish gene! (unless everyone genetically related to you prefers another version, and their reproductive success will be influenced greater than your is lessened, by you choosing another version.... ...I doubt anyone's reprodcutive success will be influenced by The only flame in town though - even the slow versions!)
Sad science geezer alert - I'll get me coat!
-
- Posts: 1752
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 10:14 pm
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 8:33 am
I will admit that, a few years back, when I first heard the "ballad" version of TOFIT, I thought "Oh, good, he has rescued the song from the GCW production." It's still an entirely valid way to feel about the song, I just don't feel that way anymore. For me, it just hasn't held up at all in its ballad version.
It's interesting to note that there doesn't seem to be a true "demo" version available for TOFIT. There is the demo on the bonus disc, which I believe dates from either the late 80s or early 90s, when he re-wrote it for Aaron Neville. And there are the two versions on the GCW bonus disc-- the alternate studio version, and the live re-interpretation from after the album was recorded. I wonder what the original demo for the song sounded like before he went into the studio for the album sessions. Was it poppier than the later ballad versions? Or did it begin as a ballad, mutate into a pop song, and then revert to its original shape? It is curious that EC never released the original demo, given all the versions he's put out now.
I think the song itself is a clever follow-up to Everyday I Write The Book, but they are both kind of hack songs. They both take their central metaphors and squeeze every last drop out of them, and they are the kind of songs that EC could probably write very quickly if he wanted to. To be honest, sometimes I wish he would. I think that Stephin Merritt does this sort of thing very well, and the records of the Magnetic Fields have sort of opened me up to not dismissing this kind of production out of hand, as I have in the past.
It's interesting to note that there doesn't seem to be a true "demo" version available for TOFIT. There is the demo on the bonus disc, which I believe dates from either the late 80s or early 90s, when he re-wrote it for Aaron Neville. And there are the two versions on the GCW bonus disc-- the alternate studio version, and the live re-interpretation from after the album was recorded. I wonder what the original demo for the song sounded like before he went into the studio for the album sessions. Was it poppier than the later ballad versions? Or did it begin as a ballad, mutate into a pop song, and then revert to its original shape? It is curious that EC never released the original demo, given all the versions he's put out now.
I think the song itself is a clever follow-up to Everyday I Write The Book, but they are both kind of hack songs. They both take their central metaphors and squeeze every last drop out of them, and they are the kind of songs that EC could probably write very quickly if he wanted to. To be honest, sometimes I wish he would. I think that Stephin Merritt does this sort of thing very well, and the records of the Magnetic Fields have sort of opened me up to not dismissing this kind of production out of hand, as I have in the past.
-
- Posts: 1752
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 10:14 pm
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
- Contact:
- noiseradio
- Posts: 2295
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 12:04 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
- Contact:
What happened?!!! I didn't take away the poll at all! I edited out the last sentence in my original post, which said "Might make an interesting poll question..."
CRAP!
Actually, when I last checked, the album version had 5 votes, and the various other versions had something like a combined 12 votes, with the bonus disc demo at 6. That's about what i figured, and it suggests that while people may not agree on which they like best, they like the album version less than the various (and more similar overall) ballad versions.
I'll redo the poll somehow.
CRAP!
Actually, when I last checked, the album version had 5 votes, and the various other versions had something like a combined 12 votes, with the bonus disc demo at 6. That's about what i figured, and it suggests that while people may not agree on which they like best, they like the album version less than the various (and more similar overall) ballad versions.
I'll redo the poll somehow.
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
--William Shakespeare
--William Shakespeare
- noiseradio
- Posts: 2295
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 12:04 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 2476
- Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2003 8:35 am
- SoLikeCandy
- Posts: 499
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 8:06 am
- Location: Indianapolis, IN
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 1752
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 10:14 pm
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
- Contact:
I really like the demo versions on other bonus discs, but the album version truly nausiates me.SoLikeCandy wrote:I never really liked this song--and my islike for it grew exponentially when I heard a Muzak version of it at the mall.
Boo. BOO.
This morning you've got time for a hot, home-cooked breakfast! Delicious and piping hot in only 3 microwave minutes.
- noiseradio
- Posts: 2295
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 12:04 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
- Contact:
laughingcrow wrote:Coming up next week:
Which version of The Town Where Time Stood Still would you eliminate from the space-time continuum if you could only play one on a loop over and over and over again IN YOUR HEAD!
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
--William Shakespeare
--William Shakespeare
-
- Posts: 1752
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 10:14 pm
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 8:33 am
- noiseradio
- Posts: 2295
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 12:04 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
- Contact: