A rope leash wrote:Ramming it violently does not necessarily mean that the sex was non-consensual.
No it absolutely doesn't, I couldn't agree more. However, the scenario he described was suggested as genuine retribution not some consensual or fantasy play. Sorry, you won't be changing my mind on this.
Deal with it? Gosh, I thought that's just what I was doing. You are the only one who ever brings up banning people from the board. I have no interest in banning either of you, though I understand it does feed your persecution complex to imply that's what I or others want. Last time I checked, all I was doing was replying to a post...
And Gilli, I don't think you're reading my words carefully. I am all for freedom between consenting partners, believe me, I feel very strongly about that. However if you go back and read what he wrote, in its context, you'll see it was a casual/joking suggestion that had nothing to do with consensual sex. and everything to do with one-directional
punishment and humilation. Oh so funny! Likewise I am not saying I think Cope is a rapist; I am saying he is talking about rape in a way that offends me-- advocating it in a joking way and not admitting it. This is not my favorite kind of post to make, believe me, I'd rather be back to posting about fried dough (to say nothing of the next Elvis records, drool) but I can't in good conscience let this crap stand. I haven't advocated he be banned frpm posting the crap, though I'd love it if he would (stop, not be banned); I'm just responding.
I know I am being a pain in the ass about this, and yes I'm boring myself to tears as well as the rest of you, but it's important.