KOA cover

Pretty self-explanatory
Post Reply

What do you think of the new cover?

Like it
5
21%
Don't mind it
13
54%
Hate it
6
25%
 
Total votes: 24

User avatar
bambooneedle
Posts: 4533
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 4:02 pm
Location: a few thousand miles south east of Zanzibar

KOA cover

Post by bambooneedle »

Image
Looks like dogshit to me. The original KOA cover was my favourite.
invisible Pole
Posts: 2228
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2004 2:20 pm
Location: Poland

Post by invisible Pole »

Agree.
Definitely prefer the original one.
If you don't know what is wrong with me
Then you don't know what you've missed
User avatar
wardo68
Posts: 855
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2004 10:21 am
Location: southwest of Boston
Contact:

Post by wardo68 »

It's just a little tinting. I imagine it will look better in person.
User avatar
migdd
Posts: 3009
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 6:16 pm
Location: Rolling in Clover, SC

Post by migdd »

It sucks!
Now Elvis joins the ranks of Jimmy Stewart, John Wayne, Cary Grant and countless other poor, "colorized" suckers!
I wonder what clever marketing genius thought of this one.
User avatar
migdd
Posts: 3009
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 6:16 pm
Location: Rolling in Clover, SC

Post by migdd »

While, I'm bashing out snide comments, may I also add that I will be impatiently awaiting the 2012 3-disc reissue of KOA that restores it's original cover to "it's intended B&W beauty". Tell me I'm wrong, I dare ya!

. . .well maybe it'll grow on me. . .
User avatar
Branst
Posts: 137
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 3:46 am
Location: Omaha, NE

Post by Branst »

I really like it. I think it's an improvement.
User avatar
SweetPear
Posts: 672
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2003 1:19 am
Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania

Post by SweetPear »

Pretty yukky.
I'm not angry anymore....
User avatar
noiseradio
Posts: 2295
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 12:04 pm
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

Post by noiseradio »

meh.
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
--William Shakespeare
User avatar
And No Coffee Table
Posts: 3524
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2003 2:57 pm

Post by And No Coffee Table »

This is at least the third variation.

1986 Columbia CD:
Image

1995 Ryko CD:
Image

2005 Rhino CD:
Image
User avatar
verbal gymnastics
Posts: 13645
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 6:44 am
Location: Magic lantern land

Post by verbal gymnastics »

The tints are getting darker. Migdd - by the time of the 2012 3 disc reissue the sleeve will be completely black.

Shades of Spinal Tap, anyone :lol:
Who’s this kid with his mumbo jumbo?
User avatar
bambooneedle
Posts: 4533
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 4:02 pm
Location: a few thousand miles south east of Zanzibar

Post by bambooneedle »

I think they've now taken into account the effect that Freddie Mercury had, late eighties, early 90's. And it's just the wrong concept... why it looks like dogshit.

...Goddammn, it's kind 'o sacriligious to both of 'em!
Monkey Girl
Posts: 57
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:09 am
Location: North Carolina

Post by Monkey Girl »

I think he looks pretty.
User avatar
spooky girlfriend
Site Admin
Posts: 3007
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 5:19 pm
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Contact:

Post by spooky girlfriend »

I guess I've always favored the 1995 version, although that is the version that I fell in love with - the one Doc had when we met. One of the few his ex didn't run off with when she left town. :wink:
User avatar
migdd
Posts: 3009
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 6:16 pm
Location: Rolling in Clover, SC

Post by migdd »

I've pulled out the original Columbia vinyl LP and the Ryko reissue CD and they are identical. Thus the Rhino reissue is the true abomination!!!!! :evil: :twisted: :evil: :twisted:
User avatar
MistakenForLilies
Posts: 66
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 8:52 pm
Location: Gallifrey

Post by MistakenForLilies »

Monkey Girl wrote:I think he looks pretty.
Hmm... I agree.
User avatar
bambooneedle
Posts: 4533
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 4:02 pm
Location: a few thousand miles south east of Zanzibar

Post by bambooneedle »

I too have the LP, showing the entire photograph. Everything was just right-- the composition, the colour, the facial expression...
Post Reply